Perth, Australia
Ratmalana, Sri Lanka
The article focuses on the effect of natural disasters on the legitimacy of South-Asian governments. The likelihood of a government to face a legitimacy crisis in a post-disaster context depends on the following parameters: 1) the frequency of disasters, 2) the quality of government response to disasters, 3) the type of political regime. This article introduces two case studies of Bangladesh and India in the aftermath of cyclone Aila in 2009. Both governments demonstrated poor preparation, as well as an inadequate immediate and long-term response, which resulted in public criticism, anti-government protests, and anti-president votes. When opposition parties converted the public frustration into broader political mobilization, the trust to the official governments plummeted, causing a crisis of legitimacy. Contrary to popular belief, democracy may not provide the easiest political environment for effective disaster response. The level of state response depends on the political security anxieties, the extent of administrative effectiveness, the corruption level, the role of the military in the disaster response, the socio-economic issues of the people affected, and the political leadership competition during the disaster management process. This study provides a deeper understanding of disaster-induced political and social tensions in Bangladesh and India. As too much of their energy was spent on disaster management, it diminished their ability to control. Political leaders in Bangladesh and India used disasters as opportunities to strengthen patronage and reject political opposition in affected areas.
democracy, disaster management, legitimacy, natural disasters, political tension, Bangladesh, India
1. Singh A. Pandemic and the emerging threshold of disaster law in South Asia. Dhaka University law journal, 2022, 32(1): 152–173. https://doi.org/10.3329/dulj.v32i1.57185
2. Rana I. A., Asim M., Aslam A. B., Jamshed A. Disaster management cycle and its application for flood risk reduction in urban areas of Pakistan. Urban Climate, 2021, (38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100893
3. Sloggy M. R., Suter J. F., Rad M. R., Manning D. T., Goemans C. Changing opinions on a changing climate: The effects of natural disasters on public perceptions of climate change. Climatic Change, 2021, 168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03242-6
4. Sindre G. M. Dynamics of post-rebel party and East Timor governance: Balancing patronage politics and popular democracy. The effects of rebel parties on governance, democracy and stability after civil wars: From guns to governing, eds. Ishiyama J., Sindre G. M. London: Routledge, 2022, 37–52.
5. Ahmad D., Afzal M. Flood risk public perception in flash flood-prone areas of Punjab, Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29: 53691–53703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19646-5
6. Drury A. C., Olson R. S. Disasters andpolitical unrest: an empirical investigation. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 1998, 6(3): 153–161.
7. Tareen H. The 2008 Sichuan earthquake and its impacts on economy. European Scientific Journal, 2023, 19(13): 49–62. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n13p49
8. Shaw R. Disaster risk reduction and community approaches. Community practices for disaster risk reduction in Japan, ed. Shaw R. Tokyo: Springer, 2014, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54246-9_1
9. García-Hernández C. Disaster, demographics, and vulnerability: Interrogating the long-term effects of an extreme weather event. Geographical Research, 2022, 60(4): 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12550
10. Marlier M. E., Resetar S. A., Lachman B. E., Anania K., Adams K. Remote sensing for natural disaster recovery: Lessons learned from Hurricanes Irma and Maria in Puerto Rico. Environmental Science & Policy, 2022, 132: 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.023
11. Oh C. H., Oetzel J. Multinational enterprises and natural disasters: Challenges and opportunities for IB research. Journal of International Business Studies, 2022, 53: 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00483-6
12. Baccini L., Leemann L. Do natural disasters help the environment? How voters respond and what that means. Political Science Research and Methods, 2021, 9(3): 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.25
13. Al-Shuely W., Ibrahim Z. Z., Al-Kindi A., Al-Saidi S., Khan T., Marikar F. A., Al-Busaidi M. Heavy metals contents on beach sediments North and South of Sohar industrial area, Oman. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2009, 2(2): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2009.73.79
14. French M. A., Barker S. F., Taruc R. R. et al. A planetary health model for reducing exposure to faecal contamination in urban informal settlements: Baseline findings from Makassar, Indonesia. Environment International, 2021, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106679
15. Misra S. K., Sharma S. K., Gupta S., Das S. A framework to overcome challenges to the adoption of artificial intelligence in Indian Government Organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122721
16. Islam M. N., Tamanna S., Van Amstel A. et al. Climate change impact and comprehensive disaster management approach in Bangladesh: A review. In: Islam M. N., Van Amstel A. Bangladesh II: Climate change impacts, mitigation and adaptation in developing countries. Cham: Springer, 2021, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71950-0_1
17. Parven A., Pal I., Witayangkurn A., Pramanik M., Nagai M., Miyazaki H., Wuthisakkaroon C. Impacts of disaster and land-use change on food security and adaptation: Evidence from the delta community in Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103119
18. Zaman T., Tahsin K. T., Rousseau Rozario S., Kamal A. B., Khan M. R., Huq S., Bodrud-Doza M. An overview of disaster risk reduction and anticipatory action in Bangladesh. Frontiers in Climate, 2022, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.944736
19. Heinzel M., Weaver C., Jorgensen S. Bureaucratic representation and gender mainstreaming in international organizations: Evidence from the World Bank. American Political Science Review, 2025, 119(1): 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055424000376
20. Newman B. M., Newman P. R. Theories of human development. 3rd ed. NY: Routledge, 2022, 584. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003014980
21. Gunasingham A. South Asia: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Maldives, Pakistan, Sri Lanka. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 2021, 13(1): 52–85. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26979986 (accessed 5 May 2025).
22. Tazneen F., Rahman H., Rahman S., Sultana N., Refat Faısal B. M. Preliminary application of space-based remote sensing and geospatial technology for investigation on the geo-environmental consequences of cyclone Aila 2009 in the Bangladesh. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 2021, 8(3): 229–244. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.837770
23. Mukhopadhyay A. Cyclone Aila and the Sundarbans: An enquiry into the disaster and politics of aid and relief. Kolkata: Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group, 2009, 24.
24. Paul B. K. Why relatively fewer people died? The case of Bangladesh’s cyclone Sidr. Natural Hazards, 2009, 50: 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9340-5
25. Parven A., Pal I., Hasan M. S. Ecosystem for disaster risk reduction in Bangladesh: A case study after the cyclone "Aila". Disaster resilience and sustainability: Adaptation for sustainable development, eds. Pal I., Shaw R., Djalante R., Shrestha S. Elsevier, 2021, chpt. 12, 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85195-4.00003-2
26. Hayat T., Kamal A. M., Hossain M. S., Zaman S., Hossain B. R., Chakraborty T. R. Accessibility analysis of cyclone shelters – a case study for Atulia Union, Satkhira, Bangladesh. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Science, 2020, 46(2): 163–178. https://doi.org/10.3329/jasbs.v46i2.54412
27. Yeasmin M., Rahman M. A., Molla S. R. The effect of drinking water sources due to cyclone Aila at Shyamnagar, Sathkhira district, Bangladesh. Journal of Tropical Resources and Sustainable Science, 2022, 10(1): 1–8. https://elibrary.ru/kpjlaf
28. Ray K., Giri R. K., Ray S. S., Dimri A. P., Rajeevan M. An assessment of long-term changes in mortalities due to extreme weather events in India: A study of 50 years’ data, 1970–2019. Weather and Climate Extremes, 2021, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2021.100315
29. Alam E., Ray-Bennett N. S. Disaster risk governance for district-level landslide risk management in Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2021, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102220
30. Alexander D. Towards the development of a standard in emergency planning. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2005, 14(2): 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560510595164
31. Post-disaster reconstruction: Lessons from Aceh, eds. Clarke P., Fanany R., Kenny S. London: Routledge, 2010, 288. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775137
